Our procedures included
examination, on a test basis, of
evidence relevant to the Identified
Sustainability Information. The
procedures selected depend on
the assurance provider’s
judgement, including the
assessment of the risks of
material non-compliance of the
Identified Sustainability
Information with the criteria.
Our work consisted of:
- interviews with a selection of
executives and senior
management to discuss their
approach to stakeholder inclusivity, materiality and
responsiveness;
- inspecting documentation to
corroborate statements of
management and senior
executives in our interviews;
- review of selected documents
to substantiate management’s
account of their application of
the AA1000APS (2008)
principles including:
| • |
selected minutes of Exco and
Board meetings, outputs
from the risk assessment
process, selected media
reports, selected policies and
general industry benchmarks; |
| • |
evaluating the data
generation and reporting
processes against the
reporting criteria; |
| • |
reviewing the GRI summary
table (located on Blue Label’s
website) to consider
management’s declaration
regarding the application of
the GRI G3 guidelines; |
| • |
reviewing the consistency
between the Identified
Sustainability Information and
related statements in Blue
Label’s Integrated Annual
Report for the year ended
31 May 2011. |
We believe that the evidence we
have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for
our limited assurance conclusion.
Blue Label’s internal corporate
reporting criteria, the Global
Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) G3
guidelines and the AA1000APS
(2008) principles standard were
applied in evaluating the Identified
Sustainability Information. |